近日，中国社会科学院国际法研究所傅攀峰博士在权威国际仲裁杂志Journal of International Arbitration（Volume 40, Issue 1, 2023）发表题为《临时仲裁在中国的法律地位：演进性与复杂性》的英文论文。Journal of International Arbitration由威科出版社（Wolters Kluwer）出版，是国际仲裁领域的重要刊物，属于ESCI期刊。

文章指出，现行中国《仲裁法》要求仲裁协议明确选定一家仲裁机构，从而间接否定了临时仲裁的合法性。不过，这并不构成中国法院根据《纽约公约》承认与执行外国临时仲裁裁决的障碍。为判断涉外临时仲裁协议的效力，中国采用的是冲突法方法。晚近，中国开始在自贸区试水临时仲裁。2021年司法部公布的《仲裁法（修订意见稿）》甚至建议在涉外领域开放临时仲裁。文章认为，临时仲裁在中国的法律地位兼具演进性与复杂性。虽然短期内临时仲裁在中国全面合法化的可能性不大，但临时仲裁的法律地位仍然会不断向前演进，折射出行政化的仲裁体制与日益精细化的仲裁市场之间的复杂关系。

英文摘要如下：

Abstract: The current People’s Republic of China (PRC) Arbitration Law rejects ad hoc arbitration by requiring the arbitration agreement to specify an arbitration institution. However, such rejection does not constitute a barrier to the enforcement of foreign ad hoc arbitration awards under the New York Convention. To determine the validity of a foreign ad hoc arbitration agreement, China adopts a conflict-of-laws approach in ascertaining its applicable law. Recent years have witnessed China’s initiative to experiment with ad hoc arbitration in its Free Trade Zones (FTZs). The draft revised PRC Arbitration Law published by the Chinese Ministry of Justice (MOJ) in 2021 proposes allowing foreign-related disputes to be resolved by ad hoc arbitration. This article argues that the legal status of ad hoc arbitration in China demonstrates a complex and evolving nature. It notes that while complete legalization of ad hoc arbitration in China is unlikely in the short term, its legal status will continue to evolve, reflecting the complicated relationship between China’s bureaucratized arbitration regime and its increasingly sophisticated arbitration market.

全文链接：

https://kluwerlawonline.com/journalarticle/Journal+of+International+Arbitration/40.1/JOIA2023003