何田田,国际法学博士,中国社会科学院国际法研究所副研究员,《国际法研究》责任编辑。
主要研究领域:国际人道法、国际刑法和国际争端解决。
主要社会兼职:上海大学法学院兼职硕士生导师。
发表成果
论文类
1. 《徘徊在法律与科学之间——国际法院的专家指定》,载《当代法学》2018年第1期。
2. 《联合国安理会决议与国际法渊源关系的思考》,载《南都学坛》2017年第3期,《人大复印报刊资料》2017年第8期全文转载;《新华文摘》数字版2017年第19期全文转载。
3. "Book Review:Philosophy of International Law", Chinese Journal of International Law, Volume 16, Issue 4, 2017(SSCI期刊)。
4. 《国际民商事条约在国内适用问题之理论探讨与实践完善》,载《南都学坛》2016年第2期。
5. 《菲律宾南海仲裁案管辖权与可受理性裁决书评析——以事实认定和证据使用为角度》,载《国际法研究》2016年第2期,该文同时载入《中国国际法年刊:南海仲裁案管辖权问题专刊》。
6. “Manila's arbitration has evidence problem”, China Daily, May 6th,2016.
7. 《国际法院“南大洋捕鲸案”评析》,载《国际法研究》2015年第1期,《人大复印报刊资料》2015年第6期全文转载。
8. “Commentary on Award on Jurisdiction and Admissibility of the Philippines-instituted Arbitration under Annex VII to the UNCLOS: A Discussion on Fact-Finding and Evidence”,Chinese Journal of Global Governance, Volume 2, Issue 1,2016
9. 《2015年国际法院司法工作综述》,《中国国际法年刊(2015年》。
He Tiantian
I. Basic Information
He Tiantian graduated from Renmin University of Chinawith a Ph.D.in International Lawin 2015. She is currently an assistant research fellow at CASS Institute of International Law and an editor of Chinese Review of International Law. Her research interests include international dispute settlement, international criminal law, international humanitarian law, and the law of the sea. She was awarded the title of one of the “100 Potential Young Scholars of Law”by Beijing Law Society in 2018.
II. Main Academic Viewpoints
In recent years, Dr. He has published several articles on the South China Sea ArbitrationCase and some procedural and evidence issues in international dispute resolution andexpressed the following views:
First, the South China Sea arbitral tribunal has no jurisdiction over the unilateral arbitration initiated by the Philippines. According to the awards, the arbitral tribunal improperly adopted and accepted the evidence provided by the Philippines. Second, with respect to procedural and evidentiary issues, the practice of international courts and tribunals has some similarities with the domestic ones while having its own characteristics. The evidentiary international practice is flexible, specific, and could be reviewed on a case-by-case basis.
III. Main Publications
Book in Chinese:
The War Crime of Child Recruitment: Analysis of the First Judgment of the International Criminal Court, Social Sciences Academic Publication, 2018.
Articles in Chinese:
(1) “International Courts of Justice and Experts Evidence: From the Perspective of Case concerning the Land and Maritime Boundary Between Cameroon and Nigeria”, Chinese Review of International Law, 30(2019);
(2) “Law Interacts with Science:Experts’ Appointment in International Court of Justice”, Contemporary Law Review, 1(2018);
(3)“Commentary on Award on Jurisdiction and Admissibility of the Philippines-instituted Arbitration under Annex VII to the UNCLOS: Fact-finding and Evidence-handling”, Chinese Review of International Law, 21 (2016);
(4) “International Law Analysis on the Philippines Submission of South China Sea Issue to International Arbitration”, Pacific Journal,12 (2013);
Articles in English:
(1)“Book Review: The Philosophy of International Law", Chinese Journal of International Law, 16 (2017);
(2)“Book Review: James Gerard Devaney, Fact-Finding before the International Court of Justice ", Chinese Journal of International Law, 17 (2018);
(3)“Manila's arbitration has evidence problem”, China Daily, May 6th,2016;
(4)“Commentary on the Award on the Jurisdiction and Admissibility of the Philippines-instituted Arbitration Case under Annex VII to the UNCLOS: A Discussion on Fact-Finding and Evidence”, Chinese Journal of Global Governance,2 (2016).